Wednesday 1 February 2012

Discussions with the wider JISC community

It was always expected that the problem space being addressed by the Smudie project would represent an area for improvement by other institutions and that they could benefit from the project outcomes. Similarly, it was expected that those other institutions would be finding solutions that SMU could benefit from. For this reason, the project will aim to be in regular dialogue with those institutions.
Tony Toole acts as Critical Friend to four different universities participating in the JISC Curriculum Design programme and meets with them regularly. The same information management issues are being addressed by these institutions as they explore transformational change in the curriculum.
This week saw the latest in a series of CAMEL meetings, organised by Tony, where all the institutions come together to share common issues in curriculum innovation and the technical systems that support curriculum design and delivery. Approaches to student information management was on the agenda and it was clear that there were remarkable similarities in the thinking being applied and the support systems being developed. This included the use of Enterprise Architecture as a business and technical modelling tool, and it was agreed that the sharing of experience across that community of practice was highly desirable.
An expectation is that the SMU project team will establish collaborative arrangements with those other development groups for mutual benefit.

Steering Group Meeting and Progress Report

The second project steering group meeting was held on the 23rd January and a progress report covering the first two months of activity was presented. The key conclusion drawn from the first round of stakeholder interviews was that the fundemental structures, technical support systems and strategy for student infomation management at SMU were sound.
The objective of a totally integrated system was on the agenda of the IS team and was being progressively addressed by members of that team in collaboration with the managers of the student information in Registry, the Faculties and elsewhere. This was a welcome message at this early stage: that the overall objective of integration was recognised and its implementation would bring valuable benefits to all of the stakeholders.
That is not to say there are no problems to be overcome or barriers to implementation. The initial survey identified a number of areas of significant inefficiency and inconsistency with regard to data entry, data processing and data access. It is expected that further areas for improvement will be added to that list as the survey continues in the next phase.
It also revealed the limited capacity for development that the very effective, but relatively small, IT support team could provide.
The survey outcomes are being used to create a model of the student information management system using Enterprise Architecture; currently at the business layer level only, but soon at the application and technical layers as well to represent the whole process and its components. The JISC-CETIS Archi tool is being used here and can be reported as being very effective indeed.